Skip to main content
Help Center

Review a document and have it approved

Attach a document to a review process, choose the reviewer and review type (Approval or Acknowledgement), have it approved and follow the status.

Prerequisites

When a document is to become binding – a work instruction, an authorisation, a sign-off – the author does not approve it himself, but attaches it to a review process. teamspace notifies the reviewer or reviewers automatically; after the approval a notification goes back to the requester. This is how a document matures from a work-in-progress into a valid version. This article shows the procedure from the perspective of both the author and the reviewer.

Note (Review). The basic procedure (attaching to a review process, automatic notification, digital approval, feedback to the requester) is confirmed by the product description; the columns For acknowledgement and Review in the Versions tab are documented. The exact button labels and dialog names of the review procedure have not yet been checked against the live interface in this version (last_verified: null).

1. Submit the document for review

  1. In the file list, click the Details icon on the right-hand edge of the file row – the detail manager opens.
  2. Switch to the Versions tab. The current version is at the top; its columns For acknowledgement and Review show the respective status.
  3. In the Actions sidebar, choose the action Submit for review. In the dialog you set the reviewer, the review (e.g. Review) and a review instruction.
The 'Submit for review' dialog with the fields Reviewer (Please choose), Review (Review) and Review instruction; in the Actions sidebar, 'Submit for review' is highlighted
Start the review process – choose the reviewer and review via "Submit for review"

2. Choose the review type: Approval or Acknowledgement

  • Approval (Review) – the specialist approval. Choose it when a second person is to sign off on the document’s content before it becomes valid (four-eyes principle).
  • Acknowledgement – the read confirmation. Choose it when the recipients only need to confirm that they have read the document (e.g. a new work instruction).

The two can be combined: first Approval by the reviewer, then Acknowledgement by the team.

Important. If you submit the document to yourself, the four-eyes principle is undermined. For the Approval, choose a person other than the author.

3. The reviewer is notified and approves

The reviewer automatically receives a notification. They open the document, review it and grant the approval digitally – or reject it with a comment. After the approval, the requester automatically receives a notification.

Request 'New homepage project', 'Review' tab with the entry 'Review' (type Approval, reviewer Volker Vorstand); the opened 'Review' dialog with the options Approve, Reject and a comment field
1 The reviewer opens the review and decides in the "Review" dialog: "Approve" or "Reject" (with a comment).
Sidebar box 'Review' after the approval: the entry 'Review' with a green tick and a speech bubble 'Looks good' on the reviewer's avatar
2 After the approval, the review is completed in green; the requester is notified automatically.

4. Check the status

  • In the Versions tab, the columns Review and For acknowledgement show the current status for each version – you can see at a glance what has already been approved.
  • Anyone who needs it can additionally see in the History tab who submitted and approved what and when (see Understand document management).

When a new version is needed

If the document is rejected or needs to be changed, you upload a new version (or edit it online). The new version is initially unreviewed and must go through the review process again – the old approved version is retained until then.

Common questions & needs

You want to …How to
Have a document approved on its meritsSubmit it for review in the Versions tab and choose the review type Approval.
Have everyone confirm they have read itAssign the review type Acknowledgement to the people concerned.
Comply with the four-eyes principleAs the reviewer, choose a person other than the author.
See who approved what and whenOpen the History tab in the detail manager.
Have a changed version approved againUpload a new version – it goes through the review process again.
Be reminded of a due re-reviewSet a reminder in the Alarms tab (see detail manager).